Why You Should Be Cautious Buying That Is Fusion 360 Free For Hobbyists Definition Of Woke IdeologyKilling the collaboration for hobbyists is a big slap in the face. My local makerspace picked fusion as our default CAD package because of the integrated collaboration and CAM. The way we teach members to use the CNC mill was built around the idea that we can share projects with experienced members to review CAM data before running parts. It helped immensely not having to export files and send them back and forth. All the changes lately seem to be confirming the fears we’ve had for years that fusion would not remain free and complete as promised at it’s launch. Each announcement brings more. More restrictions. It would be reasonable if there is an exception for models included in an assembly. Apparently that restriction is not coming until next year, so time will tell. Fusion 360helps students. Educators prepare for the future of design. It's the first 3D CAD, CAM, and CAE tool of its kind, connecting your entire product development process into one cloud-based platform.
It’s so easy to get started actually making stuff in it. We’ll see about the limitations but right now they don’t seem too severe. I was looking to Autodesk Fusion 360. Even opened a team for our family recently. I decided on that after looking at FreeCAD, Solvespace, OpenSCAD, LibreCAD, and a few others, each of which had a fundamental dealbreaker. Perhaps it will have to be FreeCAD after all. So, IMHO I _REALLY_ want an opensource solidworks/fusion360/etc competitor but at the moment its just not there yet. From the video's it looks like it should be, but once you start using it, its an endless ball of frustration. FreeCAD lets you do parametric modelling. Well as seeing all of your changes while you're making them. Also it's much more point-and-clicky, in the same way Fusion is, so it's much less confusing for a Fusion user to transition to FreeCAD rather than OpenSCAD. That said, OpenSCAD is phenomenally powerful, it just requires you to think in a particular way. I happen to enjoy thinking that way. Most of what I make ends up being OpenSCAD. I mostly use OpenSCAD to design parts, and FreeCAD to design assemblies and integrate parts into existing things. The most popular platforms also are more in demand for jobs.
You have a pile of vertices/edges/faces, you do some editing, and you have a different pile of verticies/edges/faces. There's some stuff doable with non-destructive modifiers, but they're for very limited specific tasks. Since blender is so easy to write add-ons for with their Python API, I'd be surprised if there wasn't already community effort around this. So the current Blender modeling options are isomorphic to those of a BREP modeller. Actually, blender supports many more basic objects than meshes, it's just that the basic shape must be convertible to a mesh eventually. Which is also the case in any other software, because GPUs only support mesh rasterization. On re-reading it, I think it is less clear than when I originally read it. Regardless, it's a bit of hair-splitting because he's clearly been using the free license for at least a portion of that time. The guy in the original story has been using Autodesk for 30+ years and is currently on a "Free" license. I guess the generation which refuses to pay for other's work is Generation X? As a Gen Xer, I don't appreciate that generalization. Same here, for some strange reason we have a generation that feels entitled to be paid for their work, while actively refusing to pay for the work of others. But he also mentions free licenses which are indeed "free". He also says in the next line "Are any other free users..." which means he's on a free license now. Yes, cloud bullshit, which is currently running the world based on the size and scale of the cloud providers. Yeah, because the people that wrote the software aren't worthy to be pa
0 comments:
Post a Comment